Key result
A 12-week prehabilitation program for patients awaiting heart transplantation showed potential to improve 6-minute walk test distance (427m to 465m), though recruitment was severely limited.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare the effects of a 12-week PREHAB program versus usual care on functional capacity in adults listed for heart transplantation.
Does a 12-week prehabilitation program improve functional capacity in adults awaiting heart transplantation?
RCT (n=17)
randomized
Yes
Does a 12-week prehabilitation program improve functional capacity in adults awaiting heart transplantation?
A 12-week prehabilitation program for patients awaiting heart transplantation showed potential functional benefits but faced severe recruitment and retention challenges.
Background To compare the effects of a 12-week PREHAB program and usual care (UC) on functional capacity in adults listed for heart transplantation (HTx). Secondary aims including comparing peak oxygen uptake (VO 2 peak), frailty, physical activity, mental health, cognitive function, quality of life (QoL), and dietary habits. Methods A multi-center RCT. Participants were randomized to prehabilitation (PREHAB) or UC. The 12-week PREHAB program included twice weekly high-intensity interval training (HIIT) sessions on an upright cycle ergometer, a stress management course, and a nutrition workshop. The primary outcome was functional capacity (6-minute walk test [6MWT] distance) from baseline to 12 weeks' follow-up. Secondary outcomes included changes in VO 2 peak, frailty, physical activity, severity of anxiety, depression, and stress, cognitive function, QoL, and dietary habits. Results Trial recruitment began in October 2018 and closed, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in October 2020. Of 128 patients screened, 17 were recruited (age: 44±9 years, 71% male) and 4 were randomized (PREHAB=2, UC=2). Both patients completed PREHAB, and 1 patient completed UC. Reasons for drop-out throughout the trial included: transplanted, medication and device contraindications, commitment and travel constraints, and lack of interest. PREHAB showed potential for improvements in 6MWT distance (Baseline [B]: 427, Follow-up [FU]: 465 m), VO 2 peak (B: 14.9±0.1, FU: 15.8±0.4 mL/kg/min) and QoL using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (B: 41±33, FU: 26±1 points). Conclusions Recruitment for and completion of PREHAB for patients listed for HTx proved challenging. Given wait-time limitations, future research should examine alternative PREHAB programming offered sooner following listing which addresses reported barriers to participation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reed et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in listed for heart transplantation (n=17). PREHAB program vs. usual care was evaluated on functional capacity (6-minute walk test [6MWT] distance) from baseline to 12 weeks' follow-up. A 12-week prehabilitation program for patients awaiting heart transplantation showed potential to improve 6-minute walk test distance (427m to 465m), though recruitment was severely limited.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: