Key result
Setting rat femoral arteries to a normalization factor of 1.1 achieved maximal active wall tension and improved the signal-to-noise ratio by 10% compared to the traditional factor of 0.9.
For wire myography of rat femoral arteries, a normalization factor of 1.1 yields maximal active wall tension and better signal-to-noise ratio than the traditional 0.9.
May refine preclinical myography protocols; leaves open translation to human vessels or clinical use.
Wire myograph is a device for the in vitro investigation of both, active and passive properties of arteries. Arteries from a variety of animal species, pathological states, and vascular beds were investigated using this method. We focus on the normalization procedure which is aimed to standardize experimental settings and, in part, to simulate physiological conditions. During normalization, it is determined the internal circumference of a vessel stretched to a tension that corresponds to the transmural pressure of 100 mm Hg (IC100). Once it is determined, the internal circumference is traditionally set to (0.9 IC100). However, this constant 0.9, called also the normalization factor (NF), was experimentally determined for rat small mesenteric arteries only. Therefore, the aim of our work was to show the influence of different NFs on the passive tension and reactivity of both, rat femoral arteries (FA) and the first branches of superior mesenteric arteries (MA). We found out that the maximal active wall tension of the FA was achieved at the NF value of 1.1, and that of the MA at 0.9. Considering the values of the active wall tension we suggest that higher reactivity and better signal-to-noise ratio in FA can be achieved when the NF is set at least to 1.0.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slezák et al. (2010) studied Healthy (n=10). Normalization factor of 1.1 vs. Normalization factor of 0.9 was evaluated on Active wall tension (mN/mm). Setting rat femoral arteries to a normalization factor of 1.1 achieved maximal active wall tension and improved the signal-to-noise ratio by 10% compared to the traditional factor of 0.9.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: