Why the study?
Does recombinant FMDV Ad5-P1 vaccine protect against foot-and-mouth disease in cattle?
Does recombinant FMDV Ad5-P1 vaccine protect against foot-and-mouth disease in cattle?
A recombinant FMDV Ad5-P1 vaccine provided partial protection against foot-and-mouth disease in cattle when administered subcutaneously, despite no detectable antibody response.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recombinant FMDV vaccine protects cattle subcutaneously despite absent antibodies; leaves open non-humoral correlates and translational validation.
A recombinant live vector vaccine was produced by insertion of cDNA encoding the structural proteins (P1) of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) into a replication-competent human adenovirus type 5 vaccine strain (Ad5 wt). Groups of cattle (n = 3) were immunized twice, by the subcutaneous and/or intranasal routes, with either the Ad5 wt vaccine or with the recombinant FMDV Ad5-P1 vaccine. All animals were challenged by intranasal instillation of FMDV 4 weeks after the second immunizations. In the absence of a detectable antibody response to FMDV, significant protection against viral challenge was seen in all of the animals immunized twice by the subcutaneous route with the recombinant vaccine. The observed partial protection against clinical disease was not associated with a reduction in titre of persistent FMDV infections in the oropharynx of challenged cattle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanz-Parra et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: