Key result
Combining texture features and morphologic characteristics classified carotid plaque echogenicity with 88.14% accuracy (P<.001) and identified anechoic plaques with an AUC of 0.918.
Why the study?
Can carotid plaque echogenicity be accurately classified by combining texture features and morphologic characteristics from sonograms?
Observational (n=136)
Can carotid plaque echogenicity be accurately classified by combining texture features and morphologic characteristics from sonograms?
Combining texture features and morphologic characteristics from sonograms provides high accuracy in classifying carotid plaque echogenicity, which may aid in predicting cardiovascular events.
May enhance sonographic plaque characterization; hypothesis-generating for cardiovascular risk stratification.
OBJECTIVES: Anechoic carotid plaques on sonography have been used to predict future cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether carotid plaque echogenicity could be assessed objectively by combining texture features extracted by MaZda software (Institute of Electronics, Technical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland) and morphologic characteristics, which may provide a promising method for early prediction of acute cardiovascular disease. METHODS: A total of 268 plaque images were collected from 136 volunteers and classified into 85 hyperechoic, 83 intermediate, and 100 anechoic plaques. About 300 texture features were extracted from histogram, absolute gradient, run-length matrix, gray-level co-occurrence matrix, autoregressive model, and wavelet transform algorithms by MaZda. The morphologic characteristics, including degree of stenosis, maximum plaque intima-media thickness, and maximum plaque length, were measured by B-mode sonography. Statistically significant features were selected by analysis of covariance. The most discriminative features were obtained from statistically significant features by linear discriminant analysis. The K-nearest neighbor classifier was used to classify plaque echogenicity based on statistically significant and most discriminative features. RESULTS: A total of 30 statistically significant features were selected among the plaques, and 2 most discriminative features were obtained from the statistically significant features. The classification accuracy rates for 3 types of plaques based on statistically significant and most discriminative features were 72.03% (κ= 0.571; P < .001) and 88.14% (κ= 0.820; P < .001), respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve for identifying anechoic plaques showed an area under the curve of 0.918 when the most discriminative features were used to train the classifier. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to classify carotid plaque echogenicity by combining texture features extracted from sonograms by MaZda and morphologic characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Carotid plaque (n=136). Combined texture features and morphologic characteristics was evaluated on Classification accuracy for 3 types of plaques based on most discriminative features (p=<.001). Combining texture features and morphologic characteristics classified carotid plaque echogenicity with 88.14% accuracy (P<.001) and identified anechoic plaques with an AUC of 0.918.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: