Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The structural phases formed by atomic sulfur on Au(111) due to reaction with molecular S 2 have been investigated by qualitative low-energy electron diffraction (LEED), scanning tunneling microscopy, and normal incidence X-ray standing wavefield absorption (NIXSW) combined with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Three phases are identified with increasing coverage, namely, a newly identified (5 × 5) phase, a ( × )R30° phase, and a “complex” phase. The (5 × 5) phase, with a LEED pattern having the appearance of a “split-spot” ( × )R30° pattern, is interpreted in terms of local ( × )R30° ordering within a (5 × 5) ordered domain structure. The S atoms in the (5 × 5) phase occupy fcc hollow sites 1.56 Å above the outermost extended Au(111) bulk atomic scatterer plane. A specific model of the ordering in this phase is proposed that, together with the observed marginal stability of the true, long-range-ordered, ( × )R30° phase, indicates significant short-range S−S repulsion and probably compressive surface stress. The complex phase, that coexists in a poorly ordered state with the lower coverage atomic chemisorption phases, is interpreted in terms of an incommensurate long-range periodicity, but the NIXSW data shows clear evidence of local commensuration, with the S atoms mainly close to atop sites relative to the underlying Au(111) substrate; these data provide strong support for a previously proposed model based on a sulfide layer of stoichiometry AuS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: