The valence-band photoemission of the Rh(100)-c(2×{}2)-O, Rh(100)-(2×{}2)p4g-O, and Rh(100)- c(2×{}2)-S surfaces has been investigated using an incident photon energy of 38 eV, along both the {Γ}X{'} and {Γ}M{'} directions. Local density of states calculations have also been performed for the c(2×{}2)-O and c(2×{}2)-S phases using density-functional theory. For each surface overlayer the angle-resolved photoemission measurements show significant differences in the dispersion of features with binding energies between 3 and 6 eV. These peaks are assigned with reference to the density of states calculations, and the origins of the differences in dispersion are discussed in relation to the different geometric structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mercer et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: