Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Angle-resolved photoemission measurements of the valence-electronic structure of the Ni{100}(2×{}2)C structure are compared with the results of self-consistent density-functional calculations of the two-dimensional band structure for a c(2×{}2)C overlayer on Ni{100}. Good agreement is found for the energies of the main C 2p-- and C 2s--related features at {Γ}{} and the computed dispersion is similar to, but somewhat greater than, that observed experimentally. These experimental features map in the c(2×{}2) surface Brillouin zone defined by the carbon overlayer, and not the (2×{}2) zone of the surface reconstruction. Changes in the d band structure are attributed to this reconstruction and are not found in the calculated bands or in experiments on a c(2×{}2)O overlayer, both of which involve unreconstructed surfaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McConville et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: