Key result
Among elderly Medicare patients with atrial fibrillation, 51.3% were not prescribed an oral anticoagulant, with age ≥ 85 years (OR 0.55) and intracranial bleeding (OR 0.29) strongly predicting lower utilization.
Why the study?
Oral anticoagulants reduce stroke risk in atrial fibrillation, but their underutilization patterns require analysis.
What are the prevalence and predictors of oral anticoagulant underutilization in elderly Medicare patients with incident atrial fibrillation and elevated stroke risk?
Population
1,204,507 AF patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score >= 2 from the US CMS Database
Comparison
OAC prescription vs no OAC prescription, and DOACs vs warfarin
Design
Retrospective database cohort study
Follow-up
Mean 2.4 years
Authors
Loading...
Persistent OAC underutilization in elderly Medicare AF patients signals care gaps; leaves open targeted interventions pending prospective data.
Cohort (n=1,204,507)
What are the prevalence and predictors of oral anticoagulant underutilization in elderly Medicare patients with incident atrial fibrillation and elevated stroke risk?
Odds Ratio: 0.55 (95% CI 0.55–0.56)
Despite guideline recommendations, over half of elderly Medicare patients with incident atrial fibrillation and elevated stroke risk are not prescribed oral anticoagulants, with underutilization strongly predicted by advanced age, female sex, Black race, and bleeding history.
Munir et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=1,204,507). Age ≥ 85 years vs. Younger age groups was evaluated on Oral anticoagulant (OAC) prescription (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.55-0.56). Among elderly Medicare patients with atrial fibrillation, 51.3% were not prescribed an oral anticoagulant, with age ≥ 85 years (OR 0.55) and intracranial bleeding (OR 0.29) strongly predicting lower utilization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: