The diagnostic and prognostic significance of IgM anti-HBc, studied by a solid phase u-antibody capture radioimmunoassay at a serum dilution of 1:4000, was prospectively evaluated in 73 adult patients with acute hepatitis seropositive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Of the 73 cases, 20 (27.4%) cleared their HBsAg within 6 months, while the remaining 53 (72.6%) did not. HBsAg seroconversion to its antibody occurred in 15 (93.8%) of the 16 patients positive for IgM anti-HBc with S/N ratios above 5.0, as did 5 (26.3%) of the 19 with S/N ratios between 2.1 to 5.0, and none (0%) of the 38 negative for IgM anti-HBc (S/N ratios less than 2.1). Therefore, a S/N ratio of IgM anti-HBc above 5.0 is diagnostic for acute type B hepatitis. However, low S/N ratios (2.1-5.0) of IgM anti-HBc were observed in the early stage of some patients with acute type B hepatitis, and would increase to a level greater than 5.0 when assayed again 1-2 weeks later. It was therefore suggested that repeated testing of anti-HBc IgM is mandatory for accurate diagnosis of acute type B hepatitis in patients whose initial serum specimens showed low S/N ratios of IgM anti-HBc. According to this criterion, only 22 (30.1%) of the 73 patients with acute hepatitis seropositive for HBsAg in Taiwan were true acute type B hepatitis, of whom 2 (9.1%) subsequently became chronic HBsAg carriers, while the remaining 51 (69.9%) were chronic HBsAg carriers with other superimposed forms of acute hepatic injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chu et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: