Key result
Pericardiocentesis and drainage with factor Xa inhibitor reversal effectively managed acute periprocedural pericardial effusions with tamponade, with 0 fatal or thromboembolic events among 16 cases.
Why the study?
How are periprocedural and early pericardial effusions with tamponade managed in patients undergoing AF ablation with uninterrupted factor Xa inhibitors?
Cross-Sectional (n=16)
Yes
How are periprocedural and early pericardial effusions with tamponade managed in patients undergoing AF ablation with uninterrupted factor Xa inhibitors?
Pericardiocentesis and drainage, combined with reversal agents for periprocedural cases, are effective for managing acute pericardial effusions with tamponade in patients undergoing AF ablation on uninterrupted factor Xa inhibitors.
May inform tamponade management in AF ablation on factor Xa inhibitors; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
INTRODUCTION: Because of the absence of a dedicated reversal agent, the outcome of pericardial effusion (PE) following procedures performed with uninterrupted apixaban or rivaroxaban is unknown. We report the characteristics of PEs presenting with tamponade in patients undergoing AF ablation with uninterrupted factor Xa inhibition (FXaI) to understand their management and prognosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a multicenter cross-sectional survey in 10 centers across the United States. Patient data were obtained by chart review. In all patients the procedure was performed with uninterrupted FXaI. A total of 16 PEs requiring intervention were reported from 5 centers. Two patients were on apixaban 5 mg BD, the remaining on rivaroxaban 20 mg OD. Eleven PEs occurred in the periprocedural setting, and 5 PEs occurred from 1 to 28 days after the procedure. Pericardiocentesis and drainage were performed in all cases. Protamine and 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) were given in all periprocedural cases. Two patients required surgery: in one case coagulation of the pericardial blood prevented effective drainage, and in the other bleeding was secondary to a steam pop-induced atrial tear. None of the postprocedural cases required FXaI reversal and the dose of rivaroxaban was temporarily reduced. No fatal outcomes or thromboembolic events were reported. CONCLUSION: Pericardiocentesis and drainage with FXaI reversal proved effective in the management of acute PEs with tamponade occurring periprocedurally in patients undergoing AF ablation with uninterrupted FXaI. Early postprocedural effusions can be treated with pericardiocentesis without the need of a reversal agent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gianni et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Pericardial effusion with tamponade following atrial fibrillation ablation (n=16). Uninterrupted factor Xa inhibition was evaluated on Management and prognosis of pericardial effusions presenting with tamponade. Pericardiocentesis and drainage with factor Xa inhibitor reversal effectively managed acute periprocedural pericardial effusions with tamponade, with 0 fatal or thromboembolic events among 16 cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: