Why the study?
Does apixaban improve safety and efficacy compared to traditional anticoagulants in patients with venous thromboembolism?
Does apixaban improve safety and efficacy compared to traditional anticoagulants in patients with venous thromboembolism?
Apixaban offers an effective and safer alternative to traditional vitamin K antagonists for the treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism, without the need for routine coagulation monitoring.
May support apixaban consideration for VTE; leaves open need for prospective randomized confirmation.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a common condition associated with a significant clinical and economic burden. Anticoagulant therapy is the mainstay of treatment for VTE. Current guidelines recommend the use of either low molecular weight heparins or fondaparinux overlapping with and followed by a vitamin K antagonist for the initial treatment of VTE, with the vitamin K antagonist continued when long-term anticoagulation is required. These traditional anticoagulants have practical limitations that have led to the development of direct oral anticoagulants that directly target either Factor Xa or thrombin and are administered at a fixed dose without the need for routine coagulation monitoring. The paper reviews results of the trials of apixaban application for treatment and/or long-term secondary prevention of VTE. The paper analyses effectiveness and safety of apixaban in different groups of patients, as well as features of apixaban application in every day practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gilyarov et al. (2017) conducted a review in Venous thromboembolism (VTE) (n=5,395). Apixaban vs. Standard therapy (enoxaparin and vitamin K antagonist) was evaluated on Recurrent VTE and VTE-related death (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.60-1.18).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: