Key result
Direct oral anticoagulants are non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists for preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism and superior regarding bleeding events.
Why the study?
Does apixaban or rivaroxaban improve outcomes compared to VKA in patients with acute venous thromboembolism?
Does apixaban or rivaroxaban improve outcomes compared to VKA in patients with acute venous thromboembolism?
International guidelines recommend DOAC therapy over VKA therapy following acute VTE due to non-inferiority in preventing recurrence and superiority regarding bleeding events.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) may affects all parts of the venous circulation, but frequently manifests as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Annually, around 10 million cases are diagnosed worldwide, and VTE constitutes a growing global health burden with increasing incidence and prevalence (1,2). VTE is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, and about 30% of all patients with VTE experience a recurrent event within 10 years (3). Traditionally, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have been the cornerstone in the treatment of patients with VTE, but the emergence of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC; dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) has led to a substantial shift in the pharmacological management of VTE during recent years (4). All four DOACs are non-inferior to VKA in the prevention of recurrent VTE event and superior to VKA with regard to bleeding events (5). Therefore, international guidelines recommend DOAC therapy over VKA therapy following acute VTE (6).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hellfritzsch et al. (2019) conducted an editorial in Acute venous thromboembolism. Direct oral anticoagulants (apixaban or rivaroxaban) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) was evaluated. Direct oral anticoagulants are non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists for preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism and superior regarding bleeding events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: