Why the study?
How do the kinetics of serum myoglobin compare to creatine kinase and creatine kinase-MB as indices of myocardial infarction and infarct size?
How do the kinetics of serum myoglobin compare to creatine kinase and creatine kinase-MB as indices of myocardial infarction and infarct size?
Serum myoglobin has limited independent diagnostic value for myocardial infarction, primarily serving to support creatine kinase and CK-MB as indices of infarct size.
May limit myoglobin's standalone diagnostic role in MI; leaves open additive value for infarct sizing beyond CK/CK-MB.
Serum myoglobin, creatine kinase and creatine kinase–MB as mutually supportive indices of myocardial infarction and infarct size*. R. N. Johnson, W. F. Lubbe, C. J. Mercer, N. L. Sammel and R. M. Norris, Aust. N.Z. J. Med., 1982, 12, pp. 160–165. A comparison was made between the appearance of serum myoglobin and creatine kinase in 22 patients with acute myocardial infarction who were admitted to a coronary–care unit within four hours of onset of chest pain. The MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase was measured in 12 patients. The more rapid appearance and disappearance of myoglobin relative to creatine kinase and creatine kinase–MB was confirmed, as was the correspondence between their respective peak values. A significant correlation was also obtained between the area under the myoglobin time–course and the respective peak levels. Whereas creatine kinase activity declined exponentially from a single peak, myoglobin appeared in multiple episodes inadequately represented by a single peak value and having no clear clinical correlation. The role of myoglobin as a diagnostic aid in myocardial infarction is probably limited to its ability to support creatine kinase and creatine kinase–MB as indices of infarct size.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: