Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three supramolecular networks are synthesized by the combination of Mn(II) and flexible ligands [1,2-bis (4-pyridyl) ethane (bpe); 1,3-bis (4-pyridyl) propane (bpp); 4,4‘-bipyridyl disulfide (bpds)], characterized by single-crystal X-ray analysis. All three complexes have extended solid-state structure formed by π−π interactions, and there is an excellent opportunity to elucidate the difference in the formation of extended networks in these three complexes. Complex 1, which is reported in a paper earlier by our group, is an unprecedented three-dimensional (3D) “honeycomb”-like architecture constructed from a novel sinusoidal one-dimensional (1D) chain [Mn(bpe)(H 2 O) 4 ] 2+ through π−π interactions in which bpe is used as a bidentate bridging ligand. Complex [{Mn(bpp) 3 Cl 2 }(H 2 O) 2 ] n 2 generates a “standing wave”-like architecture by π−π interactions from a neutral zigzag 1D chain of [Mn(bpp) 3 Cl 2 ]. Complex [{Mn(bpds) 2 (dca) 2 (H 2 O) 2 }(H 2 O) 4 (bpds)] n 3 is a neutral monomer [Mn(bpds) 2 (dca) 2 (H 2 O) 2 ], which is self-assembled to form a two-dimensional sheet by hydrogen bonding. These sheets interact to generate 3D supramolecular structure stabilized by an interesting “sandwiched” π-interaction involving both coordinated and solvated bpds. Solid-state fluorescence results of these flexible ligands and complexes are in agreement with their structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghosh et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: