Key result
Uncertainty in the elastic module (E) impacted the ascending aorta in a patient-specific Fluid-Structure Interaction model, while an insignificant effect was observed in the descending tract.
Why the study?
In vivo patient-specific mechanical properties of vessels represent a major source of uncertainty in computational models used for planning cardiovascular interventions.
Image-based methodology for inferring elastic properties is important for enhancing the reliability of patient-specific in silico cardiovascular models.
Uncertainty in vessel elasticity affects FSI predictions; leaves open standardization of patient-specific parameters before clinical use.
Introduction: Patient-specific computational models are a powerful tool for planning cardiovascular interventions. However, the in vivo patient-specific mechanical properties of vessels represent a major source of uncertainty. In this study, we investigated the effect of uncertainty in the elastic module (E) on a Fluid–Structure Interaction (FSI) model of a patient-specific aorta. Methods: The image-based χ-method was used to compute the initial E value of the vascular wall. The uncertainty quantification was carried out using the generalized Polynomial Chaos (gPC) expansion technique. The stochastic analysis was based on four deterministic simulations considering four quadrature points. A deviation of about ±20% on the estimation of the E value was assumed. Results: The influence of the uncertain E parameter was evaluated along the cardiac cycle on area and flow variations extracted from five cross-sections of the aortic FSI model. Results of stochastic analysis showed the impact of E in the ascending aorta while an insignificant effect was observed in the descending tract. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the importance of the image-based methodology for inferring E, highlighting the feasibility of retrieving useful additional data and enhancing the reliability of in silico models in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fanni et al. (2023) studied Cardiovascular interventions planning. Uncertainty in the elastic module (E) was evaluated on Area and flow variations extracted from five cross-sections of the aortic FSI model. Uncertainty in the elastic module (E) impacted the ascending aorta in a patient-specific Fluid-Structure Interaction model, while an insignificant effect was observed in the descending tract.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: