Nonphotochemical hole burning and pressure-dependent absorption and hole-burning results are presented for the isolated (disaggregated) chlorophyll a / b light-harvesting II trimer antenna complex of green plants. Analysis of the 4.2 K burn-fluence dependent hole spectra and zero-phonon hole action spectra indicates that the three lowest energy states (Q y ) lie at 677.1, 678.4 and 679.8 nm. Their combined absorption intensity is equivalent to that of three Chl a molecules. The inhomogeneous broadening of their absorption bands is 70 cm -1 . It is argued that these states, separated by 30 cm -1, are associated with the lowest energy state of the trimer subunit with the 30 cm -1 separations due to the indigenous structural heterogeneity of protein complexes. The linear electron−phonon coupling of the 679.8 nm state is weak and characterized, in part, by a mean phonon frequency of ω m = 18 cm -1 and Huang−Rhys factor of S m = 0.8, values which yield the correct Stokes shift for fluorescence from the 679.8 nm state at 4.2 K. The temperature dependence of the zero-phonon hole (ZPH) width for that state is consistent with optical dynamics due to coupling with glasslike two-level systems of the protein. The ZPH width at 1.9 K is 0.037 cm -1 . Satellite hole structure produced by burning in the above three states as well as their low linear pressures shift rates (about − 0.08 cm -1 /MPa) indicate that the Chl a molecule of the subunit associated with them is weakly coupled to other Chl molecules. The linear pressure shift rates for the main Q y -absorption bands are also low. The shift rates appear to be dictated by protein−Chl interactions rather than excitonic couplings. Holes burned into the 650 nm absorption band reveal energy transfer times of 1 ps and ∼100 fs which are discussed in terms of time domain measurements of the Chl b → Chl a transfer rates (Connelly et al. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 1902). The holewidths associated with burning into the 676 nm absorption band lead to Chl a → Chl a transfer times in the 6−10 ps range, in good agreement with the time domain values (Savikhin et al. Biophys. J. 1994, 66, 1597).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pieper et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: