Key result
Fourteen shared decision making tools for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation were identified, which produced small improvements in patient knowledge and reductions in decisional conflict.
Why the study?
Shared decision making tools can help implement guideline recommendations for stroke prevention in AF, but the characteristics, quality, and clinical impact of available tools needed characterization.
Do shared decision making tools improve patient knowledge and reduce decisional conflict in patients with atrial fibrillation considering stroke prevention strategies?
Systematic Review
Do shared decision making tools improve patient knowledge and reduce decisional conflict in patients with atrial fibrillation considering stroke prevention strategies?
While several shared decision making tools exist for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, they lack rigorous evaluation regarding their ability to effectively facilitate high-quality shared decision making.
Few SDM tools for AF stroke prevention meet quality standards or show clinical impact; leaves open need for rigorous testing before routine use.
OBJECTIVE: Shared decision making (SDM) tools can help implement guideline recommendations for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) considering stroke prevention strategies. We sought to characterize all available SDM tools for this purpose and examine their quality and clinical impact. METHODS: We searched through multiple bibliographic databases, social media, and an SDM tool repository from inception to May 2020 and contacted authors of identified SDM tools. Eligible tools had to offer information about warfarin and ≥1 direct oral anticoagulant. We extracted tool characteristics, assessed their adherence to the International Patient Decision Aids Standards, and obtained information about their efficacy in promoting SDM. RESULTS: We found 14 SDM tools. Most tools provided up-to-date information about the options, but very few included practical considerations (e.g., out-of-pocket cost). Five of these SDM tools, all used by patients prior to the encounter, were tested in trials at high risk of bias and were found to produce small improvements in patient knowledge and reductions in decisional conflict. CONCLUSION: Several SDM tools for stroke prevention in AF are available, but whether they promote high-quality SDM is yet to be known. The implementation of guidelines for SDM in this context requires user-centered development and evaluation of SDM tools that can effectively promote high-quality SDM and improve stroke prevention in patients with AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roldan et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Atrial Fibrillation. Shared decision making (SDM) tools vs. Usual care or baseline was evaluated on Availability, quality (IPDAS adherence), and efficacy of SDM tools. Fourteen shared decision making tools for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation were identified, which produced small improvements in patient knowledge and reductions in decisional conflict.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: