Key result
The 2-dose Rotarix vaccine would annually result in 263 extra discounted QALYs compared with other vaccines, averting 24,022 homecare cases, 10,779 medical visits, 392 hospitalizations, and 12 deaths.
Why the study?
Health outcome gains in QALYs and cost improvements are important factors for selecting a national immunization program vaccine among safe and effective rotavirus vaccines available in Mexico.
Does 2-dose Rotarix provide better health outcome gains and cost improvements compared to 3-dose RotaTeq and 3-dose Rotasiil in Mexican infants?
Does 2-dose Rotarix provide better health outcome gains and cost improvements compared to 3-dose RotaTeq and 3-dose Rotasiil in Mexican infants?
In Mexico, the 2-dose HRV vaccine provides higher health gains (QALYs) and cost savings compared to HBRV due to earlier protection and greater coverage.
May inform Mexico NIP vaccine choice via modeled savings; leaves open real-world validation and optimal selection.
Rotavirus (RV) infection causes acute rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) in infants. Safe and effective RV vaccines are available, of which Mexico has included one in its national immunization program (NIP) since 2007. Health outcome gains, expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and cost improvements are important additional factors for the selection of a NIP vaccine. These two factors were analyzed here for Mexico over one year implementing three RV vaccines: 2-dose Rotarix (HRV), versus 3-dose RotaTeq (HBRV), and 3-dose Rotasiil (BRV-PV), presented in a 1-dose or 2-dose vial). HRV would annually result in discounted QALY gains of 263 extra years compared with the other vaccines by averting an extra 24,022 homecare cases, 10,779 medical visits, 392 hospitalizations, and 12 deaths. From a payer's perspective and compared with HRV, BRV-PV 2-dose vial and BRV-PV 1-dose vial would annually result in $13,548,179 and $4,633,957 net savings, respectively, while HBRV would result in $3,403,309 extra costs. The societal perspective may also show savings compared with HRV for BRV-PV 2-dose vial of $4,875,860, while BRV-PV 1-dose vial and HBRV may show extra costs of $4,038,363 and $12,075,629 respectively. HRV and HBRV were both approved in Mexico, with HRV requiring less investment than HBRV with higher QALY gains and cost savings. The HRV vaccine produced those higher health gains due to its earlier protection and greater coverage achieved after its schedule completion with two doses only, providing full protection at four months of age instead of longer periods for the other vaccines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gómez et al. (2023) studied Rotavirus gastroenteritis. Rotarix (HRV) vs. RotaTeq (HBRV) and Rotasiil (BRV-PV) was evaluated on Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs. The 2-dose Rotarix vaccine would annually result in 263 extra discounted QALYs compared with other vaccines, averting 24,022 homecare cases, 10,779 medical visits, 392 hospitalizations, and 12 deaths.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: