Key result
High expression of VEGFR1 and VEGFD predicted poor cancer-specific survival on univariate analysis but were not independently prognostic on multivariate analysis, while metastases showed significantly greater expression of Ki67, p53, VEGFR1, SLUG, and SNAIL compared to primary tumors.
Observational (n=177)
No
While clinico-pathological parameters remain the most significant predictors of cancer-specific survival in RCC, metastases show significantly greater expression of proliferation, angiogenesis, and EMT markers compared to primary tumors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
VEGFR1/VEGFD expression should not yet guide RCC prognosis or therapy; leaves open metastasis-specific targeting in prospective studies.
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most deadly of urological malignancies. Metastatic disease affects one third of patients at diagnosis with a further third developing metastatic disease after extirpative surgery. Heterogeneity in the clinical course ensures predicting metastasis is notoriously difficult, despite the routine use of prognostic clinico-pathological parameters in risk stratification. With greater understanding of pathways involved in disease pathogenesis, a number of biomarkers have been shown to have prognostic significance, including Ki67, p53, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (VEGFR1) and ligand D (VEGFD), SNAIL and SLUG. Previous pathway analysis has been from study of the primary tumour, with little attention to the metastatic tumours which are the focus of targeted molecular therapies. As such, in this study a tissue microarray from 177 patients with primary renal tumour, renal vein tumour thrombus and/or RCC metastasis has been created and used with Automated Quantitative Analysis (AQUA) of immunofluorescence to study the prognostic significance of these markers in locally advanced and metastatic disease. Furthermore, this has allowed assessment of differential protein expression between the primary tumours, renal vein tumour thrombi and metastases. The results demonstrate that clinico-pathological parameters remain the most significant predictors of cancer specific survival; however, high VEGFR1 or VEGFD can predict poor cancer specific survival on univariate analysis for locally advanced and metastatic disease. There was significantly greater expression of Ki67, p53, VEGFR1, SLUG and SNAIL in the metastases compared with the primary tumours and renal vein tumour thrombi. With the exception of p53, these differences in protein expression have not been shown previously in RCC. This confirms the importance of proliferation, angiogenesis and epithelial to mesenchymal transition in the pathogenesis and metastasis of RCC. Importantly, this work highlights the need for further pathway analysis of metastatic tumours for overcoming drug resistance and developing new therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laird et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Renal cell carcinoma (n=177). High expression of VEGFR1 vs. Low expression of VEGFR1 was evaluated on Cancer specific survival (multivariate analysis) (HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.66-2.38, p=0.485). High expression of VEGFR1 and VEGFD predicted poor cancer-specific survival on univariate analysis but were not independently prognostic on multivariate analysis, while metastases showed significantly greater expression of Ki67, p53, VEGFR1, SLUG, and SNAIL compared to primary tumors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: