Key result
Sustained release formulations of clopidogrel were found to be more effective for longer periods than the commercial product in rabbit models.
Why the study?
Does a sustained release formulation of clopidogrel improve effectiveness compared to the commercial product in rabbits?
Does a sustained release formulation of clopidogrel improve effectiveness compared to the commercial product in rabbits?
A novel sustained release formulation of clopidogrel demonstrated prolonged effectiveness compared to the commercial product in a preclinical rabbit model.
Does not support clinical adoption of sustained-release clopidogrel; extends preclinical evidence in rabbit models.
Clopidogrel bisulphate has quite low bioavailability (40-50%). It was aimed to increase its bioavailability by designing a controlled release dosage form of clopidogrel, which is different from available current dosage forms in the market. There are also some attempts to overcome patent protection of clopidogrel by combination of active substances or preparation of controlled release tablets. Therefore, it was also aimed to determine in vitro and in vivo properties of controlled release clopidogrel tablets. The amounts of releases from formulations were subjected computer program and effects of components in the formulation on release were investigated (INFORM v.3.7 and FORMRULES, Intelligensys Ltd). Two sustained release formulations and innovator product were selected and their effectiveness was compared by in vivo tests in rabbits. In conclusion, proposed controlled release formulations were found to be an alternative and to be more effective for longer periods than the commercial one.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2010) studied this question. Sustained release formulation of clopidogrel vs. Innovator product was evaluated on In vivo effectiveness. Sustained release formulations of clopidogrel were found to be more effective for longer periods than the commercial product in rabbit models.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: