Key result
The use of the NCDR database to guide quality improvement programs was associated with a 6% lower trend in in-hospital costs for acute myocardial infarction compared to similar hospitals (p=0.041).
Why the study?
There is a lack of information on the impact on the costs of medical care associated with quality improvement initiatives based on data from international registries.
Does a quality improvement program using the NCDR database reduce in-hospital costs and readmissions in patients admitted with myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=1,610)
Yes
Does a quality improvement program using the NCDR database reduce in-hospital costs and readmissions in patients admitted with myocardial infarction?
Effect estimate: 6% lower cost trend
p-value: p=0.041
Implementing an NCDR-guided quality improvement program in a Brazilian hospital was associated with a lower trend in in-hospital costs and reduced readmission rates for MI patients compared to similar hospitals.
OBJECTIVES: Quality improvement (QI) initiatives based on data from international registries have been reported previously; however, there is a lack of information on the impact on the costs of medical care associated with the use of these tools. METHODS: Patients admitted due to myocardial infarction (MI), included in the ACTION Registry® and CathPCI Registry®, in a private Brazilian hospital (i.e., the reference hospital) were analyzed. The costs of care of these patients were compared to the costs of MI admissions in nine similar hospitals not included in the same QI program. Regression models were used to analyze the cost change over time between the two groups of hospitals. Readmission rates were compared using logistic regression, adjusting for the same variables as in the cost model. RESULTS: Overall, the annual medical cost inflation in Brazil was higher than the annual cost trend in the reference hospital during the period of analysis. Moreover, the annual in-hospital costs indicate that the reference hospital has a statistically significant 6% lower cost trend for patients with acute MI, compared to patients with the same diagnostic code in the comparison hospitals group, in an adjusted analysis (p-value=0.041). Using multivariable analysis, the readmission rates were also found to be significantly lower in the reference hospital than in the comparison hospitals, with an odds ratio of 0.68 (p-value=0.042). CONCLUSION: The use of the NCDR® as a benchmark to guide QI programs outside the United States was associated with the positive impact of bending the cost curve to below that of national medical inflation and the comparison hospitals' costs, with a lower incidence of hospital readmission.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Myocardial infarction (n=1,610). National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) for Quality Improvement vs. Similar hospitals not participating in the quality improvement program was evaluated on Annual in-hospital cost trend for acute myocardial infarction admissions (6% lower cost trend, p=0.041). The use of the NCDR database to guide quality improvement programs was associated with a 6% lower trend in in-hospital costs for acute myocardial infarction compared to similar hospitals (p=0.041).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: