Key result
Rivaroxaban treatment for pulmonary embolism was associated with a shorter adjusted mean length of stay (3.77 vs 5.48 days; P<.001) and lower hospitalization costs compared with warfarin.
Why the study?
Does rivaroxaban reduce inpatient length of stay and hospitalization costs in adults with pulmonary embolism compared to warfarin?
Cohort (n=1,502)
Does rivaroxaban reduce inpatient length of stay and hospitalization costs in adults with pulmonary embolism compared to warfarin?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.77% vs 5.48%
p-value: p=< .001
In patients hospitalized for pulmonary embolism, treatment with rivaroxaban is associated with significantly shorter length of stay and lower hospitalization costs compared to warfarin.
Shorter PE stays with rivaroxaban warrant caution before practice change; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
PURPOSE: Using real-world data, this study compares inpatient length of stay (LOS) and costs for patients with a primary diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) initiating treatment with oral anticoagulation with rivaroxaban versus warfarin. METHODS: Hospitalizations from MarketScan's Hospital Drug Database were selected from November 1, 2012, through December 31, 2013, for adults with a primary diagnosis of PE initiating treatment with rivaroxaban or warfarin. Warfarin patients were matched 1:1 to rivaroxaban patients using exact and propensity score matching. Hospital LOS, treatment patterns, and hospitalization costs were evaluated. FINDINGS: Matched cohorts included 751 rivaroxaban-treated patients and 751 warfarin-treated patients. Adjusted mean LOS was 3.77 days for rivaroxaban patients (95% CI, 3.66-3.87 days) and 5.48 days for warfarin patients (95% CI, 5.33-5.63 days; P < .001). Mean (SD) LOS was shorter for patients taking rivaroxaban whether admission was for provoked PE (rivaroxaban: 5.2 [5.1] days; warfarin: 7.0 [6.5] days; P < .001) or unprovoked PE (rivaroxaban: 3.4 [2.3] days; warfarin: 5.1 [2.7] days; P < .001). Mean (SD) days from first dose to discharge were 2.5 (1.7) (rivaroxaban) and 4.0 (2.9) (warfarin) when initiated with parenteral anticoagulants (P < .001) and 2.7 (1.7) (rivaroxaban) and 4.0 (2.2) (warfarin) without parenteral anticoagulants (P < .001). The rivaroxaban cohort incurred significantly lower unadjusted mean (SD) hospitalization costs (rivaroxaban: $8473 [$9105]; warfarin: $10,291 [$9185]; P < .001), confirmed by covariate adjustment with generalized linear modeling estimating predicted mean hospitalization costs of $8266 for rivaroxaban patients (95% CI, $7851-$8681) and $10,511 for warfarin patients (95% CI, $10,031-$10,992; P < .001). IMPLICATIONS: patients with PE treated with rivaroxaban incurred significantly lower hospitalization costs by $2245 per admission compared with patients treated with warfarin, which was attributable to cost offsets from 1.71 fewer days of stay in the hospital.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Margolis et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Pulmonary embolism (n=1,502). Rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on inpatient length of stay (LOS) (p=< .001). Rivaroxaban treatment for pulmonary embolism was associated with a shorter adjusted mean length of stay (3.77 vs 5.48 days; P<.001) and lower hospitalization costs compared with warfarin.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: