Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Historical studies in Thailand have been closely related to the formation of the nation since the late nineteenth century, and until recently the pattern of the past in this elitist craft changed but little. It presented a royal/national chronicle, a historiography modern in character but based upon traditional perceptions of the past and traditional materials. It was a collection of stories by and for the national elite celebrating their successful mission of building and protecting the country despite great difficulties, and promising a prosperous future. The plot and meaning of this melodramatic past have become a paradigm of historical discourse, making history an ideological weapon and a source of legitimation of the state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thongchai Winichakul (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: