Why the study?
Does intravenous diltiazem suppress premature ventricular contractions and reduce heart rate in atrial fibrillation during halothane anesthesia?
Does intravenous diltiazem suppress premature ventricular contractions and reduce heart rate in atrial fibrillation during halothane anesthesia?
Intravenous diltiazem is effective for rapidly treating premature ventricular contractions and atrial fibrillation-mediated tachyarrhythmias during halothane anesthesia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support IV diltiazem for PVCs and AF rate control during halothane anesthesia; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
The antiarrhythmic effects of diltiazem (DL), a slow channel inhibitor, were evaluated in the presence of epinephrine-halothane-induced arrhythmias in dogs, of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) during anesthesia in patients (n = 10), and of tachyarrhythmias with associated atrial fibrillation (AF) during anesthesia in patients (n = 9). The arrhythmogenic dose of epinephrine (ADE) during one MAC of halothane in dogs was increased from 1.13 +/- 0.21 to 3.14 +/- 0.89 microgram X kg-1 X min-1 by the administration of 0.3 mg/kg of DL. This suggests that DL significantly increases the threshold for the induction of arrhythmias associated with epinephrine and halothane. In 10 patients, PVCs that appeared spontaneously during halothane anesthesia were eliminated by the intravenous administration of DL (0.1 mg/kg). With an additional nine patients who had had AF preoperatively and suffered tachyarrhythmias during anesthesia, the intraoperative intravenous administration of DL significantly decreased heart rate (to less than 100 beats/min) within 10-15 min. Diltiazem is an effective means for the treatment of PVCs and AF-mediated tachyarrhythmias during anesthesia. Because of the pharmacologic properties of DL (e.g., depressing sinus and atrioventricular (AV) node function), DL should be used with caution in patients with a sick sinus syndrome or an AV block, or in the presence of beta-adrenergic antagonists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iwatsuki et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: