Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In order to compare the accuracy of "source-based" and "diffraction-cone" incremental length diffraction coefficients (ILDCs), the high-frequency scattered far fields of a perfectly conducting circular disk are computed using physical optics (PO) enhanced with source-based and diffraction-cone ILDCs. For angles of incidence and scattering that are near grazing to the disk, the diffraction-cone ILDCs predict bistatic scattered far fields that are generally much greater than the exact far fields and that are much less accurate than the scattered far fields predicted by the source-based ILDCs. These results lead us to conclude that the source-based ILDCs are preferable for improving upon the accuracy of PO fields computed with general purpose computer codes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shore et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: