Why the study?
Does intravenous diltiazem improve hemodynamic parameters in patients with acute myocardial infarction within 24 hours of onset?
Does intravenous diltiazem improve hemodynamic parameters in patients with acute myocardial infarction within 24 hours of onset?
Intravenous diltiazem safely reduces afterload and myocardial oxygen consumption in the acute phase of myocardial infarction.
Suggests hemodynamic benefits of IV diltiazem in acute MI; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Experimentally, diltiazem has demonstrated favorable effects on acute myocardial infarction in animals. In this study, we administered diltiazem intravenously to 11 patients with acute myocardial infarction within 24 hours from the onset and examined the hemodynamic changes. Dose was 20 minutes of 0.5 mg/min and 20 minutes of 1.0 mg/min (i.e., total 30 mg). Hemodynamic results were decrease in heart rate, blood pressure (systolic, diastolic), mean arterial pressure, double product (p less than 0.01), and systemic vascular resistance (p less than 0.05). On the other hand, stroke volume index increased (p less than 0.01). There were no significant changes in mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, cardiac index, and stroke work index. Serum diltiazem concentrations during intravenous administration in our study were near the steady-state plasma concentrations in which oral multiple-dose administration of diltiazem 60 mg twice or thrice daily resulted in 2 to 3 days. It is concluded that diltiazem can be administered safely to patients with acute myocardial infarction in acute phase and has two favorable hemodynamic effects on acute myocardial infarction. One is decrease of afterload, as evidenced by the decrease in systemic vascular resistance and in mean arterial pressure. Second is the decrease of double product as an index of myocardial oxygen consumption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogawa et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: