Why the study?
Does CP-060S reduce myocardial infarct size in a canine model of ischemia-reperfusion?
Does CP-060S reduce myocardial infarct size in a canine model of ischemia-reperfusion?
CP-060S, a novel cardioprotective drug, significantly limits myocardial infarct size in a canine model of ischemia-reperfusion, likely through prevention of Na+ and Ca2+ overload.
Does not support clinical use; leaves open translation of CP-060S to human ischemia-reperfusion.
The myocardial infarct size (IS)-limiting effect of CP-060S, a novel cardioprotective drug that prevents Na+-, Ca2+-overload and has Ca2+ channel-blocking activity, was compared with that of diltiazem, a pure Ca2+ antagonist, to determine whether the prevention of Na+-, Ca2+-overload contributes to this IS-limiting effect. Dogs were subjected to 90 min of left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) occlusion followed by 5 h of reperfusion. Either CP-060S (300 microg/kg) or diltiazem (600 microg/kg) was administered intravenously 20 min before the occlusion. CP-060S significantly limited IS compared with that of vehicle (percentage of the area at risk: vehicle, 50.64 +/- 6.08%; CP-060S, 21.13 +/- 3.75%; p < 0.01 vs. vehicle). Although diltiazem exerted a significant decrease in rate-pressure product (RPP; an index of myocardial oxygen consumption) during occlusion equal to that of CP-060S, diltiazem did not significantly reduce IS (33.90 +/- 4.30%). Regional myocardial blood flow (RBF) was not significantly different between any of the groups. Therefore the IS-limiting effect of CP-060S cannot be explained in terms of changes in RPP or RBF. Thus the IS limitation induced by CP-060S is probably the consequence of a direct cardioprotective effect on myocytes. The prevention of Na+-, Ca2+-overload may be the primary reason for this IS-limiting effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzuki et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: