Key result
Elevated stress hyperglycemia ratio was significantly associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (OR 3.18) in patients with diabetes following acute myocardial infarction.
Why the study?
While acute hyperglycemia predicts AKI in nondiabetic AMI patients, its discriminatory ability in diabetic patients is unclear, prompting evaluation of the stress hyperglycemia ratio versus admission glycemia alone.
Does stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) predict acute kidney injury better than admission blood glucose alone in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=1,215)
No
Does stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) predict acute kidney injury better than admission blood glucose alone in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Odds Ratio: 3.18 (95% CI 1.99–5.09)
Absolute Event Rate: 13% vs 4.4%
p-value: p=<0.001
The stress hyperglycemia ratio is a superior predictor of acute kidney injury and in-hospital adverse events compared to admission blood glucose alone in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction.
BACKGROUND: Acute hyperglycemia has been recognized as a robust predictor for occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in nondiabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), however, its discriminatory ability for AKI is unclear in diabetic patients after an AMI. Here, we investigated whether stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR), a novel index with the combined evaluation of acute and chronic glycemic levels, may have a better predictive value of AKI as compared with admission glycemia alone in diabetic patients following AMI. METHODS: SHR was calculated with admission blood glucose (ABG) divided by the glycated hemoglobin-derived estimated average glucose. A total of 1215 diabetic patients with AMI were enrolled and divided according to SHR tertiles. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared. The primary endpoint was AKI and secondary endpoints included all-cause death and cardiogenic shock during hospitalization. The logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential risk factors. Accuracy was defined with area under the curve (AUC) by a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: In AMI patients with diabetes, the incidence of AKI (4.4%, 7.8%, 13.0%; p < 0.001), all-cause death (2.7%, 3.6%, 6.4%; p = 0.027) and cardiogenic shock (4.9%, 7.6%, 11.6%; p = 0.002) all increased with the rising tertile levels of SHR. After multivariate adjustment, elevated SHR was significantly associated with an increased risk of AKI (odds ratio 3.18, 95% confidence interval: 1.99-5.09, p < 0.001) while ABG was no longer a risk factor of AKI. The SHR was also strongly related to the AKI risk in subgroups of patients. At ROC analysis, SHR accurately predicted AKI in overall (AUC 0.64) and a risk model consisted of SHR, left ventricular ejection fraction, N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) yielded a superior predictive value (AUC 0.83) for AKI. CONCLUSION: The novel index SHR is a better predictor of AKI and in-hospital mortality and morbidity than admission glycemia in AMI patients with diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction with diabetes (n=1,215). Elevated stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) vs. Lower stress hyperglycemia ratio was evaluated on Acute kidney injury (AKI) (OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.99-5.09, p=<0.001). Elevated stress hyperglycemia ratio was significantly associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (OR 3.18) in patients with diabetes following acute myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: