Why the study?
Do calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporin A or tacrolimus) impair endothelial function and hemorheology in renal transplant recipients compared to healthy subjects?
Do calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporin A or tacrolimus) impair endothelial function and hemorheology in renal transplant recipients compared to healthy subjects?
Cyclosporin A, but not tacrolimus, is associated with significant endothelial dysfunction in renal transplant recipients, though this does not appear to be driven by hemorheological factors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cyclosporin A but not tacrolimus was associated with endothelial dysfunction in renal transplant recipients; hypothesis-generating, needs prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Calcineurin inhibitors, mainly cyclosporin A (CsA), are associated with endothelial dysfunction in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). Hemorheological disturbances including decreased erythrocyte deformability (ED), increased plasma viscosity and erythrocyte aggregation (EA) have also been reported in CsA-treated RTRs. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between hemorheological factors and endothelial dysfunction in CsA- and tacrolimus (Tc)-treated RTRs. METHODS: Thirty-one RTRs and 16 healthy subjects were recruited. The RTR group received either CsA (n = 16) or Tc (n = 15). Endothelial function was evaluated by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery. ED and EA were measured with laser-assisted optical rotational cell analyzer, and plasma viscosity by a cone-plate viscometer. RESULTS: FMD of the CsA group was significantly lower than that of controls (6.3% ± 5.1% vs. 11.9% ± 5.6%, p = 0.024), whereas, there was no significant difference between the Tc group (8.8% ± 5.4%) and controls. At shear stresses ranging between 0.95 and 30 Pa, EDs of the CsA group were significantly lower compared with controls. In the Tc group, the decrease in ED was significant at shear stresses ranging between 0.53 and 5.33 Pa. ED indices did not correlate with FMD in any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of endothelial dysfunction and reduction in ED were more remarkable in patients on CsA therapy. Hemorheological factors were not likely to be associated with endothelial dysfunction in RTRs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akoğlu et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: