Why the study?
Does a real-time thermal imaging-based non-contact method accurately measure respiration rate compared to contact methods in adults?
Population
15 adults for method evaluation, and 14 subjects for segmentation evaluation (55,000 thermal images)
Comparison
Real-time thermal imaging based, non-contact… vs Two contact respiration rate monitoring methods…
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
May support non-contact respiration monitoring in stable adults; leaves open clinical use due to motion artifacts in small samples.
Does a real-time thermal imaging-based non-contact method accurately measure respiration rate compared to contact methods in adults?
A novel thermal imaging-based non-contact respiration rate monitor shows promise but is currently limited by susceptibility to large head movements.
Alkali et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: