Why the study?
To examine the associations of three major insurance-covered hospital discharge services with 30-day potentially avoidable readmissions among older adults after rehabilitation in acute care hospitals in Tokyo, Japan.
Do hospital discharge services reduce potentially avoidable readmissions within 30 days in older adults after rehabilitation in acute care hospitals?
Do hospital discharge services reduce potentially avoidable readmissions within 30 days in older adults after rehabilitation in acute care hospitals?
Insurance-covered hospital discharge services were not associated with a reduction in 30-day potentially avoidable readmissions among older adults discharged home after acute care rehabilitation.
No association of discharge services with 30-day PARs; leaves open whether enhanced transitional programs reduce readmissions in older adults.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations of 3 major hospital discharge services covered under health insurance (discharge planning, rehabilitation discharge instruction, and coordination with community care) with potentially avoidable readmissions (PARs) within 30 days in older adults after rehabilitation in acute care hospitals in Tokyo, Japan. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using a large-scale medical claims database of all Tokyo residents aged ≥75 years. SETTING: Acute care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent rehabilitation and were discharged to home (N=31,247; mean age in years ± SD, 84.1±5.7) between October 2013 and July 2014. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: 30-day PAR. RESULTS: Among the patients, 883 (2.9%) experienced 30-day PAR. A multivariable logistic generalized estimating equation model (with a logit link function and binominal sampling distribution) that adjusted for patient characteristics and clustering within hospitals showed that the discharge services were not significantly associated with 30-day PAR. The odds ratios were 0.962 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.805-1.151) for discharge planning, 1.060 (95% CI, 0.916-1.227) for rehabilitation discharge instruction, and 1.118 (95% CI, 0.817-1.529) for coordination with community care. In contrast, the odds of 30-day PAR among patients with home medical care services were 1.431 times higher than those of patients without these services (P<.001), and the odds of 30-day PAR among patients with a higher number (median or higher) of rehabilitation units were 2.031 times higher than those of patients with a lower number (below median) (P<.001). Also, the odds of 30-day PAR among patients with a higher Hospital Frailty Risk Score (median or higher) were 1.252 times higher than those of patients with a lower score (below median) (P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: The insurance-covered discharge services were not associated with 30-day PAR, and the development of comprehensive transitional care programs through the integration of existing discharge services may help to reduce such readmissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitsutake et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: