Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the impact of the 2019 ESC/EAS guideline on cardiovascular risk management compared with the 2016 guideline in general practice.
Does the application of the 2019 ESC/EAS guideline compared to the 2016 guideline change LDL-C target achievement rates in patients with known CV risk?
Does the application of the 2019 ESC/EAS guideline compared to the 2016 guideline change LDL-C target achievement rates in patients with known CV risk?
The 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines significantly lowered LDL-C target achievement rates in general practice, highlighting a large gap in optimal lipid-lowering therapy utilization.
May alter lipid-lowering eligibility for many primary care patients; leaves open whether updated targets improve outcomes.
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the 2019 published European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guideline on cardiovascular (CV) risk management compared with its predecessor from 2016 in a cohort in general practice. We performed a cross-sectional retrospective study with data from electronic medical records. The study cohort included 103,351 patients with known CV risk. We assessed changes in CV risk classification and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target values, the impact on LDL-C achievement rates, and the current lipid-lowering treatments. Under the 2019 ESC guideline, CV risk categories changed in 27.5% of patients, LDL-C target levels decreased in 71.4% of patients, and LDL-C target achievement rate dropped from 31.1% to 16.5%. Among non-achievers according to the 2019 guideline, 52.2% lacked lipid-lowering drugs entirely, and 41.5% had conventional drugs at a submaximal intensity. Of patients in the high-risk and very high-risk categories, at least 5% failed to achieve the LDL-C target level despite treatment at maximal intensity with conventional lipid-lowering drugs, making them eligible for PCSK-9 inhibitors. In conclusion, the 2019 ESC/EAS guideline lowered LDL-C target values for the majority of patients in general practice and halved LDL-C target achievement rates. There is still a large undeveloped potential to lower CV risk by introducing conventional lipid-lowering drugs, particularly in patients at high or very high CV risk. A substantial proportion of the patients can only achieve their LDL-C targets using PCSK-9 inhibitors, which would currently require an at least 10-fold increase in prescribing of these drugs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meier et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: