Why the study?
Do women with degenerative mitral valve disease have worse long-term clinical outcomes after mitral repair compared with men?
Do women with degenerative mitral valve disease have worse long-term clinical outcomes after mitral repair compared with men?
Women undergoing mitral repair for myxomatous degeneration present with more advanced disease and have a higher risk of recurrent mitral regurgitation compared to men, suggesting a need for earlier surgical referral.
Women had higher recurrent MR risk after repair without survival difference; observational data leaves open sex-specific referral timing.
OBJECTIVES: Studies have consistently shown that women have worse perioperative outcomes following mitral surgery compared with men. Few data are available that explain these divergent outcomes. This study was conducted to determine whether women with degenerative mitral valve disease present to surgery with more advanced disease than men, and to determine whether these differences influence long-term clinical outcomes. METHODS: Seven hundred and forty-three patients underwent repair of mitral regurgitation due to myxomatous degeneration between 2001 and 2014. Of these, 208 (28%) were females and concomitant coronary bypass grafting was performed in 103 (14%). The mean clinical follow-up was for 3.1 years, and extended to 11.9 years. Five-year survival and freedom from recurrent MR ≥2+ were 88.7 ± 1.8 and 90.7 ± 1.6%, respectively. Although gender was not associated with survival (hazard ratio: 1.04 ± 0.4, P = 0.91), women were more likely to develop recurrent MR ≥2+ at follow-up compared with men (hazard ratio: 1.9 ± 0.5, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: In this large series, women with degenerative mitral valve disease presented with echocardiographic markers suggestive of more advanced disease at the time of surgery. Although there was no difference in early or late survival between groups, women were more likely to develop recurrent MR ≥2+ over the course of follow-up. Earlier surgical referral of women may, therefore, be advised.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: