Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Platelet counting using samples of plasma from platelet concentrates prepared for transfusion was assessed. The methods employed included a manual phase-contrast method, and counting with Coulter S Plus and Sysmex E-2500 counters. All methods were reproducible (mean CV of 4.9, 2.2 and 1.4%, respectively). However, neat samples of platelet concentrates analysed by Coulter counter were inaccurate (mean count of 863.8 x 10(9)/l compared to 1018.9 x 10(9)/l counted manually). Moreover, the Coulter platelet counts were non-linear above 900 x 10(9)/l, whereas the E-2500 platelet counts were linear to 2700 x 10(9)/l. A one-in-three pre-dilution was required to obtain accurate, linear counts with the Coulter counter, whereas the E-2500 was accurate without pre-dilution (mean count of 1030.2 x 10(9)/l compared to 1018.9 x 10(9)/l counted manually). In conclusion, the method of platelet counting may affect true platelet yields.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lord et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: