Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The prognostic value of liver stiffness measurements for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is not known. The present study aimed to investigate the use of transient elastography in predicting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development and mortality in patients with CHB. Five hundred and twenty-eight patients with HBeAg-negative CHB underwent liver stiffness measurements and were prospectively followed up every 3-6 months for a median length of 35 months. The patients were divided into those with liver stiffness < 10 kPa (group 1) and ≥ 10 kPa (group 2). Of the 528 patients, 324 (61%) were men. The median age was 42 years. Compared with group 1, group 2 had a higher percentage of men, with higher median levels of age, liver biochemistry, and viral load. At the third year of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of HCC was higher in group 2 compared with group 1 (9%vs 0%, respectively, P < 0.001). The cumulative liver-related mortality was also higher in group 2 compared to group 1 (4%vs 0%, respectively, P < 0.001). After multivariate analysis, only liver stiffness measurement (LSM) was significantly associated with HCC development and mortality. There was also a higher cumulative incidence of hepatitis flares in group 2 compared to group 1 (46%vs 14%, respectively, P = 0.001) in patients with normal ALT, with higher LSM and AST being significantly associated with subsequent flares. In HBeAg-negative CHB patients, a liver stiffness measurement of ≥ 10 kPa was associated with a significantly increased risk of subsequent HCC development and mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fung et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: