Why the study?
Do direct thrombin inhibitors provide adequate anticoagulation in patients with or at risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Do direct thrombin inhibitors provide adequate anticoagulation in patients with or at risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Direct thrombin inhibitors such as argatroban and bivalirudin are effective alternative anticoagulants for patients with or at risk of HIT undergoing PCI.
Patients with or at risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at particular risk of thrombosis due to the prothrombotic nature of HIT and the endovascular disruption from PCI. Patients require aggressive anticoagulation during PCI, and alternative, nonheparin anticoagulation is recommended over heparin in patients with acute or previous HIT. Argatroban, bivalirudin, and lepirudin are nonheparin, fast-acting, parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs). Multicenter, prospective studies have demonstrated that argatroban and lepirudin each reduce thrombosis in HIT and that argatroban and bivalirudin each provide adequate anticoagulation during PCI in patients with or at risk of HIT. We review current therapeutic practices with direct thrombin inhibitors in patients with or at risk of HIT during PCI, including individuals requiring periprocedural anticoagulation, and the factors influencing the choice of DTI in this setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lewis et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: