Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Structured reporting improves the completeness and consistency of radiology documentation and may reduce error rates. This study evaluated a deep learning–based natural language processing (NLP) framework for the automatic conversion of free-text rectal MRI reports, acquired for local staging, into standardized structured reports. Two expert radiologists authored 151 synthetic free-text rectal MRI reports and completed corresponding structured versions following the template of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). These paired reports were used to fine-tune a large-scale pretrained text-to-text model (mT5) to extract 200 categorical variables corresponding to the fields of the structured report. Performance was assessed using accuracy, balanced accuracy, and F1-score. To mitigate class imbalance, a second training session was carried out after performing a targeted permutation of underrepresented variables. In the first training session, the model achieved an accuracy (mean ± SD) of 0.96 ± 0.08, a balanced accuracy of 0.93 ± 0.16, and an F1-score of 0.96 ± 0.09. In the second training session, after permutation, performance was an accuracy of 0.94 ± 0.09, a balanced accuracy of 0.85 ± 0.23, and an F1-score of 0.93 ± 0.10. The mT5 model achieved high performance in the automatic structuring of rectal cancer staging MRI reports, without significant degradation after targeted permutation of variables in the second training session.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fanni et al. (2026) studied this question.