Why the study?
The study evaluated the occurrence of an accessory papillary muscle uniting the LV apex with the basal or mid antero-septum using echocardiography and cardiac MRI.
What is the prevalence of a left ventricle accessory antero-septal papillary muscle in HOCM patients and controls as assessed by echocardiography and CMR?
What is the prevalence of a left ventricle accessory antero-septal papillary muscle in HOCM patients and controls as assessed by echocardiography and CMR?
An accessory antero-septal papillary muscle is a common anatomical variant, present in over half of routine echocardiograms and universally in the studied HOCM cohort.
Characterizes accessory LV papillary muscle on echo/CMR; leaves open prevalence, function, and clinical relevance.
Background. We studied by means of echocardiography and cardiac MRI (CMR) the occurrence of an accessory papillary muscle that unites mostly the left ventricle (LV) apex with the basal or mid antero-septum. Methods. We included all good quality echocardiography and CMR studies as reviewed by two cardiologists and assessed the occurrence of a contractile papillary muscle situated between the LV apex and antero-septum. Results. A contractile accessory papillary muscle situated between the LV apex and the antero-septum was seen in 100% of HOCM patients and 62% of control patients (p=0.05) in the CMR images acquired from a total of 22 HOCM (9) and control (13) patients. The same structure was observed in 241 patients representing 69.5% of all-comers echocardiography studies. The age was 69 ± 17 years on average in the echocardiography arm, patients harboring the antero-septal accessory muscle being older (71.6 + 15.7 years old vs 63.5 ± 18.1 for those without, p=0.0005). We exemplify this structure by parasternal long axis still echocardiography images and clips from 24 patients and CMR SSFP still images and a clip from two HOCM patients and one control. Conclusion. A contractile accessory papillary muscle was observed in more than half of the all-comer echocardiography studies, and in all HOCM patients in the CMR arm. Further research is needed to fully characterize the anatomical and physiological significance of this structure attaching in the immediate vicinity of the LVOT in HOCM and control patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Angheloiu et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: