Why the study?
Do endothelial function and cardiovascular autonomic activity differ between patients with neurally mediated syncope who are HUT-positive, HUT-negative, and healthy controls?
Do endothelial function and cardiovascular autonomic activity differ between patients with neurally mediated syncope who are HUT-positive, HUT-negative, and healthy controls?
Patients with neurally mediated syncope and a positive head-up tilt test exhibit enhanced baseline endothelial function and parasympathetic autonomic activity compared to those with a negative test and healthy controls.
Hypothesis-generating link between positive tilt testing and enhanced endothelial function in neurally mediated syncope; warrants prospective validation before clinical use.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate endothelial function and cardiovascular autonomic activity in patients with neurally mediated syncope (NMS). METHODS: Patients with a typical history of NMS were divided according to the result of a head-up tilt (HUT) test. There were 25 patients each in the HUT-positive (HUT+), HUT-negative (HUT-) and control groups. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiography (AECG) were performed before the HUT tests. RESULTS: The HUT+ group had a significantly higher FMD than that of the HUT- group and the control group (8.8 ± 3.3 vs. 6.4 ± 2.9%, p = 0.006, and 8.8 ± 3.3 vs. 5.7 ± 2.2%, p = 0.001, respectively). On a 24-hour AECG, the parasympathetic indexes of time domain, such as rMSSD and the pNN50, were significantly higher in the HUT+ group than in the HUT- group (39.0 ± 9.6 vs. 31.6 ± 9.6 ms, p = 0.016, and 16.5 ± 8.1 vs. 10.2 ± 7.2%, p = 0.002, respectively) and the control group (39.0 ± 9.6 vs. 28.9 ± 9.6%, p = 0.001 and 16.5 ± 8.1 vs. 8.7 ± 6.7%, p = 0.001, respectively). High-frequency spectra (parasympathetic activity) of the frequency domain showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Not only parasympathetic activity, but also endothelial function may affect the results of HUT tests in patients with NMS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: