Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INTRODUCTION: Natural products and metabolomics are intrinsically linked through efforts to analyze complex mixtures for compound annotation. Although most studies that aim for compound identification in mixtures use MS as the main analysis technique, NMR has complementary advances that are worth exploring for enhanced structural confidence. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to showcase a portfolio of the main tools available for compound identification using NMR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: COLMAR, SMART-NMR, MADByTE, and NMRfilter are presented using examples collected from real samples from the perspective of a natural product chemist. Data are also made available through Zenodo so that readers can test each case presented here. CONCLUSION: H NMR, HSQC, TOCSY, HSQC-TOCSY, and HMBC data for all samples and fractions from a natural products study is strongly suggested. The same is valid for MS analysis to create a bridged analysis between both techniques in a complementary manner. The use of NOAH supersequences has also been suggested and demonstrated to save NMR time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borges et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: