Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative study reveals a complex integration process among electric wheelchair users, indicating device prescription must account for identity, usability, and social dynamics.
PURPOSE: To explore the experiences of using an electric wheelchair in daily living. METHODS: Fifteen participants, eight women and seven men, living in different parts of a Nordic country were interviewed. The interviews were conducted in the home or at the workplace. Open-ended questions were used. The data were collected and analyzed according to the grounded theory. RESULTS: Analysis resulted in one core category: "Integrating the electric wheelchair - a manifold process", describing a process commencing from initial resistance against use of an electric wheelchair, to acceptance with various extent of integration. Six categories emerged that represent this core process: incorporating the electric wheelchair into the self-identity process, calculating functional consequences, encountering the reactions of others, facing duality in movability, using proactive strategies, and being at the mercy of the system. Findings indicate that the integration process is complex and manifold. Practical, personal, and social dimensions were intertwined and significantly involved. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating an electric wheelchair is a process closely connected to symbolic value, usability, community mobility and identity. These aspects should be considered in the production, prescription, and adaptation processes. Implications for Rehabilitation Integrating an electric wheelchair is a process closely connected to symbolic value, usability, community mobility, and identity. These aspects should be considered in the wheelchair production, prescription, and adaptation processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stenberg et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: