Why the study?
Over the past decade, the discovery and development of P2Y12R antagonists have significantly advanced, offering novel treatment options that improve clinical outcomes.
Recent patent and literature developments highlight reversible P2Y12R antagonists as potentially safer alternatives to irreversible agents for antithrombotic therapy.
P2Y12R antagonists may extend to fibrosis and cancer; leaves open clinical validation in non-cardiovascular settings.
Introduction P2Y12 receptor (P2Y12R) is a G protein-coupled receptor that plays a crucial role in regulating platelet activation and aggregation. P2Y12R is involved in various processes such as renal fibrosis, cancer, ischemic disease, and related complications, making it an appealing target for therapeutic interventions. Over the past decade, the discovery and development of P2Y12R antagonists have significantly advanced, offering novel treatment options that improve clinical outcomes.Areas covered This review covers P2Y12R antagonists reported in patents issued in the online databases of the World Intellectual Property Organization and the European Patent Office from 2019 to 2024. This review introduces the development of existing antagonists and evaluates the therapeutic potential of these compounds.Expert opinion Reversible P2Y12R antagonists offer a potentially safer alternative to the currently dominant irreversible antagonists on the market, as they allow for more controlled platelet inhibition and can reduce the toxicity and adverse effects associated with conventional drugs. Importantly, the integration of computational drug design and molecular docking studies in the discovery and optimization of P2Y12R antagonists represents a significant advancement in precision medicine. This not only provides valuable structural scaffolds but also stimulates novel ideas for developing promising drugs that are both safe and efficacious.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: