Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The efficient use of anhydrous NH 3 as a fertilizer depends on factors such as N rate, knife spacing, depth of application, and soil properties like NH 3 ‐retention capacity. We developed a computer model that predicts some characteristics of an NH 3 ‐retention zone in soil. Soil titratable acidity to pH 9 using NH 4 OH as the base was an input to the model used to estimate the NH 4 ‐N (NH 3 and NH 4 ) concentration at the line of injection 24 h after NH 3 application. Data for the model were collected using a laboratory apparatus that applies anhydrous NH 3 in a band. Ammoniacal‐N concentration with distance away and normal to the line of injection was predicted using a nonlinear equation and values of N rate, band spacing, and soil bulk density. Soil pH was calculated as a linear function of the ammoniacal‐N concentration in soil with ammoniacal N at pH 9 equal to titratable acidity. Direct losses of NH 3 by volatilization were assumed to occur because of insufficient depth of application or rates of N application that were too high. Concentrations of NH 4 and NH 3 in solution were calculated using the Gapon cation‐exchange and Henderson‐Hasselbach equations, respectively. Observed vs. predicted ammoniacal N and pH at different distances from the injection line for seven soils and 13 rates (1.6–8.4 g N m −1 ) correlated at P < 0.01 ( r 2 = 0.85 and 0.84, respectively). The model provided reasonable estimates of direct NH 3 loss and concentration of ammoniacal species in solution. This tool could help to better understand the behavior of NH 3 in soil and, therefore, to manage its application to reduce N losses. Information on ammoniacal‐N distribution and on soil pH in an NH 3 band could also be used for simulating transformations of banded N.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Izaurralde et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: