Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
UV‐based technologies have been proposed for the treatment of wastewater containing bisphenol A (BPA), a toxic, endocrine‐disruptor pollutant. Nevertheless, the evaluation of the role of process variables through experimental design has not been previously addressed. In this study, the effects of BPA and H 2 O 2 initial concentrations, and specific photon emission rate ( E P,0 ) on BPA degradation by the UV and UV/H 2 O 2 processes were investigated, using the Doehlert design and response surface analysis. The experiments were performed in a tubular reactor equipped with a 254‐nm UV lamp, for [H 2 O 2 ] 0 and E P,0 in the ranges 1.6–9.6 mmol · L −1 and 0.87 × 10 18 –3.6 × 10 18 photons · L −1 · s −1 , respectively. Photolysis ([BPA] 0 = 10–50 mg · L −1 ) was shown to be inefficient for BPA degradation and mineralization, with pollutant removals lower than 55 %. The specific BPA photolysis rate and BPA removal decreased with increasing [BPA] 0 . In contrast, all the UV/H 2 O 2 experiments ([BPA] 0 = 50 mg · L −1 ) resulted in total BPA degradation after 60 min of irradiation. In this case, the best conditions were [H 2 O 2 ] 0 = 7.6 mmol · L −1 and E p,0 = 3.6 × 10 18 photons · L −1 · s −1 , achieving the highest BPA degradation rate and removal after 15 min, and the second highest TOC removal after 180 min. In most experiments less than 75 % TOC removal was achieved, with 95 % mineralization observed solely for the highest [H 2 O 2 ] 0 and E P,0 . In any case, the residual toxicity and endocrine activity of treated solutions must be determined, in order to prove the applicability of the UV/H 2 O 2 process for real water and wastewater treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Araujo et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: