Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a simulation model to assess the impact of type 1 diabetes and its associated complications on health-related quality of life of a population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The methodology builds upon 1) an existing population model of type 1 diabetes progression, 2) an empirical study designed to measure state- and age-specific health statuses of type 1 diabetes, and 3) existing literature to quantify quality of life of the corresponding health status. Health statuses were measured in a group of type 1 diabetic patients using the Medical Outcomes Study short form 36 (SF-36). A published empirical regression equation was then used to predict corresponding Quality of Well-Being Index (QWB) scores from these assessments. The QWB scores were incorporated into a previously developed type 1 diabetes progression and cost simulation model. Sensitivity analyses on key parameters were performed, and the model was found to be robust. RESULTS: The augmented model can estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as well as costs associated with type 1 diabetes on any population of interest over any period of time. The model is used to compare intensive versus conventional treatment strategies using a simplified set of assumptions regarding the relative effects of these alternative treatments. With these assumptions, intensive strategy produces more QALYs than does conventional strategy and is cost-beneficial after 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The model enables health planners to perform cost-effectiveness analyses to compare alternative treatment strategies for type 1 diabetes and support subsequent decision making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: