L-type calcium channels in human coronary arteries are predominantly localized within the smooth muscle cells of the tunica media, providing an anatomical basis for the vasodilatory effects of calcium antagonists.
May support CCB vasodilatory effects via coronary media channels; leaves open human translation from animal data.
The anatomical localization of Ca2+ channels of the L-type was analyzed in sections of the human right and anterior interventricular coronary arteries by using in vitro light microscope autoradiography associated with radioligand binding techniques. [3H]Nicardipine was utilised as a ligand. Binding of the radioligand to sections of the two coronary arteries was time-, temperature- and concentration-dependent. Analysis of binding isotherms revealed a dissociation constant value of about 0.5 nM in the two arteries and maximum binding capacities of 139 +/- 6.4 fmol/mg tissue for the right coronary artery and of 173 +/- 9.5 for the anterior interventricular branch. The pharmacological profile of [3H]nicardipine binding to sections of human coronary arteries was consistent with the labelling of Ca2+ channels of the L-type. Dihydropyridine derivatives were the most powerful competitors of [3H]nicardipine binding, whereas phenylalkylamines, benzothiazepine or non-selective channel modulators were weak competitors or ineffective. Light microscope autoradiography revealed the highest density of [3H]nicardipine binding sites in the tunica media of the coronary arteries. In this layer Ca2+ channels of the L-type are located within smooth muscle cells. A lower accumulation of the radioligand occurred in the tunica adventitia, whereas no specific binding was found in the tunica intima. Study of the localization of Ca2+ channels in sections of human coronary arteries may contribute to a better understanding of the mechanism of the marked coronary dilatory activity elicited by Ca2+ antagonists demonstrable in both in vitro preparations and in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferrante et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: