A variety of techniques have been developed to evaluate cell proliferation. Many of these methods provide a more accurate means of assessing the true proliferation rate of a given neoplasm, as compared with the simple assessment of mitotic activity. Similar to the evaluation of mitotic activity, these methods are also subject to limitations associated with tumor heterogeneity and interobserver variability. This paper reviews a variety of methodologies including radiolabeling, flow cytometric, and immunohistochemical that have been used in recent years to evaluate cell proliferation in brain neoplasms. Factors that affect these methodologies and their practical application to routine practice of diagnostic neuropathology will be explored.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard A. Prayson (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: