Why the study?
Does nicainoprol suppress ventricular arrhythmias in canine models?
Does nicainoprol suppress ventricular arrhythmias in canine models?
Nicainoprol demonstrates antiarrhythmic efficacy in canine models of ventricular arrhythmias, suggesting potential clinical utility.
Supports antiarrhythmic effects in canine models; hypothesis-generating for clinical translation.
Using two-stage coronary ligation-, digitalis- and adrenaline-induced canine ventricular arrhythmias, antiarrhythmic effects of nicainoprol were examined in dogs, and the minimum effective plasma concentration for each arrhythmia model was determined. Nicainoprol suppressed the arrhythmias, and the minimum effective plasma concentrations for arrhythmias induced by 48 hr coronary ligation, digitalis and adrenaline were 8.9 micrograms/ml (by 5 mg/kg, i.v.), 3.0 micrograms/ml (by 3 mg/kg, i.v.) and 2.7 micrograms/ml (by 3 mg/kg, i.v.), respectively. The concentration for coronary ligation arrhythmia was higher than those for the digitalis and adrenaline arrhythmias. This pharmacological profile is similar to those of aprindine and propafenone. Nicainoprol induced some central nervous system effect including vomiting in conscious coronary ligated dogs. Though intravenous nicainoprol (5 mg/kg) was not effective on 24 hr coronary ligation arrhythmia, an oral dose of 30 to 40 mg/kg was effective. These results indicate that it may become a clinically useful antiarrhythmic drug.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hashimoto et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: