Why the study?
Machine learning models are computationally demanding and typically require transmitting data to remote cloud servers, prompting efforts to use microcontroller units as local inference devices for healthcare wearables.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
May enable real-time, privacy-preserving wearable analytics; leaves open prospective clinical validation before practice change.
The use of machine learning in medical and assistive applications is receiving significant attention thanks to the unique potential it offers to solve complex healthcare problems for which no other solutions had been found. Particularly promising in this field is the combination of machine learning with novel wearable devices. Machine learning models, however, suffer from being computationally demanding, which typically has resulted on the acquired data having to be transmitted to remote cloud servers for inference. This is not ideal from the system’s requirements point of view. Recently, efforts to replace the cloud servers with an alternative inference device closer to the sensing platform, has given rise to a new area of research Tiny Machine Learning (TinyML). In this work, we investigate the different challenges and specifications trade-offs associated to existing hardware options, as well as recently developed software tools, when trying to use microcontroller units (MCUs) as inference devices for health and care applications. The paper also reviews existing wearable systems incorporating MCUs for monitoring, and management, in the context of different health and care intended uses. Overall, this work can be used as a kick-start for embedding machine learning models on MCUs, focusing on healthcare wearables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diab et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: