Why the study?
ERAS programs require upfront and ongoing investments, and outlining implementation and sustainability costs alongside potential cost savings was needed to inform hospitals considering adopting this care approach.
What are the economic implications and potential cost savings of implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs for colorectal surgery?
What are the economic implications and potential cost savings of implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs for colorectal surgery?
Implementing ERAS programs in colorectal surgery requires upfront investment but can lead to significant cost savings and improved patient outcomes.
ERAS may reduce HAIs and LOS in colorectal surgery; leaves open optimal implementation strategies for sustained gains.
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs are transdisciplinary, evidence-based perioperative protocols that aim to standardize best practices and increase the value of delivered healthcare. Quality improvement programs such as ERAS for colorectal surgery have been linked to a reduction in rates of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) including surgical site infection as well as a reduction in overall length of stay. Importantly, to achieve these results, hospitals must commit to fostering transdisciplinary collaboration across surgery, anesthesiology, and nursing, as well as alignment between frontline providers and hospital executives. This requires upfront investment as well as ongoing resource allocation to sustain the program but given the magnitude of the potential impact of a successful ERAS program on multiple domains of quality and safety, the investment will easily reap ongoing rewards. The purpose of this manuscript is to outline implementation and sustainability costs of an ERAS program as well as discuss the potential cost savings related to the program to further inform hospitals considering adoption of this approach to care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stone et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: